(928) 377-5230
Julie Nave, MA, LPC
Clinical Director
Julie Nave, MA, LPC, is the Clinical Director at AnchorPoint in Prescott, Arizona, with over 25 years of experience in behavioral health, mental health counseling, and addiction recovery. She provides clinical leadership and oversight to ensure trauma-informed, evidence-based care that supports long-term healing for individuals and families.
Julie holds a Master of Arts in Counseling from Northern Arizona University and a Bachelor of Science in Psychology and Communications from the University of Wisconsin. She is a Licensed Professional Counselor, independently credentialed by the Arizona State Board of Behavioral Health since 2004, and is certified in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). Her focus on professional development, quality improvement, and individualized treatment planning reinforces AnchorPoint’s mission to facilitate transformative change in a supportive and faith-aligned environment.
Kevin Lussier
I highly recommend this facility, the staff truly care. Even long after I’ve graduated treatment, I’m still connected. Helping me through all stages of my growth. I didn’t just go to treatment, I found a new way to live. I’m living my best life and my journey has just begun. I’m forever grateful.
After years of struggling with substance abuse and deep-rooted trauma, my loved one was lost, hopeless, and disconnected from both himself and God. AnchorPoint not only helped him find recovery, but also led him back to faith and a completely new way of living. The compassion, patience, and dedication of the team is unlike anything we’ve experienced. They didn’t just treat symptoms, they helped him heal from the inside out. Today he’s thriving, living a healthy spiritually grounded lifestyle. We are forever grateful for the role AnchorPoint played in this transformation.
It is such a welcoming facility with all the comforts of home, an excellent location to recover and be transformed by the faith-based Christian program it offers for healing and restoration!
In the early 1930s, there wasn’t much that actually worked to treat alcoholism. People tried willpower, ineffective medical treatments such as shock therapy, and even religious rituals, but long-term sobriety was rare, and alcoholism was not fully understood.
Most people who struggled with alcohol abuse were written off as lacking discipline rather than struggling with something deeper. Alcoholics Anonymous grew out of this frustration, failed attempts, and people running out of options.
AA has a long history, and what started as a conversation between two individuals struggling with alcoholism has grown into a global fellowship helping millions stay on the path of sobriety.
Its core idea is built on peer recovery. It’s not therapy or an official “medical treatment.” Instead, it’s a structured support system where those in recovery from alcohol use disorder can talk about their problems, hold each other accountable, and follow a set of rules known as the 12 Steps.
Before diving into the history of AA, it’s important to understand the core principles that have made it one of the longest-running recovery programs. There are a few important things that make AA work [1]:
In 1935 in Akron, Ohio, two men who were both struggling with alcoholism met and connected over shared principles they had learned from the Oxford Group, a Christian recovery movement. That connection helped them form what became the first AA meeting.
The principles focused on honesty, accountability, and helping others. This gave them both the idea that those in alcohol recovery could stay sober by supporting each other and sharing similar experiences.
The original AA program they developed encouraged powerlessness over alcohol, relying on a higher power (loosely defined), peer support, and personal accountability. In 1939, Wilson published Alcoholics Anonymous (“The Big Book”), which outlined the Twelve Steps—a structured approach to recovery that became AA’s founding philosophy [2].
The foundation of Alcoholics Anonymous was built by two men whose personal struggles with alcoholism shaped what the program would become [3].
Bill W. was a New York stockbroker whose drinking almost ruined his life before he got sober in the 1930s. He battled chronic depression and recurring anxiety throughout his life and had periods of self-doubt about AA and questioned whether he was doing enough to help others.
Despite these challenges, he stayed committed to the AA fellowship, continuing to write, correspond, and mentor thousands of members. His later years were largely devoted to ensuring AA’s stability and growth.
Dr. Bob was a surgeon from Ohio who struggled with alcoholism for years while maintaining his medical career. He stayed sober from 1935 until his death in 1950, a period of nearly 15 years of continuous sobriety. He continued to practice medicine and remained actively involved in AA, serving as a steady, practical example for newcomers.
Unlike Bill, Dr. Bob was less public-facing and less reflective on personal struggles, taking sobriety day by day.
Alcoholics Anonymous is often used as a support tool alongside formal treatment, not a replacement for it. Many rehab programs encourage or even require patients to attend meetings during and after treatment because AA is free, widely available, and ongoing—there’s no “end date” like there is with a 30-day program.
AA gives people a place to go after rehab where they can stay connected, build a routine, and talk honestly with others who understand what they’re dealing with. For many people, it becomes part of their weekly rhythm, especially during early recovery when structure really matters.
A large portion of treatment programs in the U.S. (estimated 60% to 80%) still incorporate AA or similar 12-step approaches. It’s accessible, peer-led, and reinforces accountability and social support, which are huge factors in long-term recovery [4].
At the same time, not every provider (or member) fully buys in. Some prefer only to use evidence-based approaches like cognitive behavioral therapy or medication-assisted treatment, and see AA as something that can help certain people but isn’t universally effective.
Success can depend a lot on the specific meeting or group dynamic, which varies widely. AA works best when it’s one option among many—something people can choose to use if it fits, rather than something they’re told is the only path.
It’s difficult to get exact success rates for AA because it’s anonymous and doesn’t keep track of members in a formal, consistent way. That being said, studies often find that about 20–40% of people who actively participate in AA stay sober after a year [5].
At the same time, the data isn’t one-sided. Dropout rates are high, especially early on, and many people attend only a few meetings before stopping. Outcomes also vary a lot depending on how involved someone is, with casual attendance showing weaker results than consistent participation.
So the numbers don’t tell a simple success-or-failure story; they mostly show that AA can work well for some people, particularly those who stick with it, but it’s not a guaranteed solution.
AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) isn’t a formal medical treatment in the same way as an evidence-based therapy or medication is. It’s a peer-support program based on shared experience and a structured 12-step approach incorporating spiritual principles. For some people, it works very well, especially when combined with professional treatment. For others, it may not be enough on its own. Think of it more as a supportive community than a medical cure to addiction.
AA meetings give members a connection with people who “get it” because they’ve lived it. It’s a space to share struggles and hear real-life stories of recovery, which can be comforting and increase motivation.
No, AA isn’t a cult in the traditional sense. It doesn’t have a controlling leader or secret teachings, and participation is voluntary. Some people find the spiritual language in the 12 steps off-putting, but it’s meant to be flexible, with many members interpreting it non-religiously. The key is that members come and go freely.
That’s more common than people think. AA works really well for some, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Before writing it off completely, some people try a few different meetings, as each group can feel very different in tone and style. But if it still doesn’t click, that’s okay. There are other solid options, such as therapy, SMART Recovery, or even smaller, less formal support groups.
AA grew in a grassroots way. After the first meetings in the 1930s, people who found it helpful would bring the idea back to their own cities and start new groups. The release of the “Big Book” in 1939 gave people a shared framework to follow, which made it easier to replicate meetings without needing official leadership.
AnchorPoint Recovery is a Christian rehab rooted in neuroscience and guided by the NeuroFaith® model, developed by Dr. Jeffrey Hansen, PhD, which integrates faith and evidence-based therapies to treat trauma and addiction. We offer several levels of care to guide patients through their recovery journey from start to finish.
Although treatment plans are tailored to each individual’s needs, AnchorPoint follows a unified therapeutic framework—much like the AA model—that emphasizes surrender, accountability, and connection to a higher purpose.
By helping men move beyond self-reliance and isolation, we guide them toward healing that integrates brain science with faith, restoring meaning, identity, and hope beyond addiction.
We work with a variety of insurance plans and are committed to reducing financial barriers to care.
[1] AA.org. What Is AA?
[2] AA.org. The Start and Growth of AA.
[3] WGN News. 2025. Bill W & Dr. Bob: True Story of the Founders of AA.
[4] Humphreys, M. et al. (2020). Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs for alcohol use disorder. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 3(3), CD012880.
[5] Kaskutas, A. (2009). Alcoholics anonymous effectiveness: faith meets science. Journal of addictive diseases, 28(2), 145–157.
